Sexual Harassment Claims (Quid Pro Quo, Hostile Work Environment) Survive Summary Judgment Against Hyatt

In Franco v. Hyatt Corp. d/b/a Hyatt Times Square et al, No. 12422, 153152/14, 2019-3451, 2020 WL 7346434 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., Dec. 15, 2020), the court, inter alia, reversed summary judgment granted in favor of defendants on plaintiff’s quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment claims asserted under the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

The court summarized the “black letter” law as follows:

The issue in a quid pro quo sexual harassment case brought under the State Human Rights Law is whether one or more employment decisions are linked to unwelcome sexual conduct. Sexual harassment occurs when such unwelcome sexual conduct is the basis, either explicitly or implicitly, for employment decisions affecting compensation or the terms, condition or privileges of employment (Matter of Father Belle Community Ctr v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 221 A.D.2d 44, 50 [4th Dept 1996], lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 809 [1997]; see Suri v. Grey Global Group, Inc., 164 AD3d 108 [1st Dept 2018], appeal dismissed, 32 NY3d 1138 [2019] ). An employer can also be held liable for a hostile work environment when it encouraged or acquiesced in the unwelcome sexual conduct by an employee or subsequently condoned the offending behavior (Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, 311 [2004]; Sukram v. Anjost Corp., 72 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2010). Proof of condonation and acquiescence is not necessary where discriminatory conduct is perpetrated by a high-level managerial employee or someone sufficiently elevated in the employer’s business organization to be viewed as its proxy (Randall v. Tod–Nik Audiology, 270 A.D.2d 38 [1st Dept 2000]; Father Belle, 221 AD3d at 54–55). Under the City Human Rights Law, gender discrimination rests on the broader consideration of whether a plaintiff has been treated less well than other employees because of his/her gender (Suri, 164 AD3d at 114; Williams v. New York City Hous. Auth., 61 AD3d 62, 78 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 702 [2009] ). Whether brought under the State or the City Human Rights Law, the claim will not succeed if the offending actions are no more than petty slights or trivial inconveniences.

Applying the law, the court held:

The gravamen of defendants’ argument in favor of dismissal of the discrimination claims is that the offending actions plaintiff attributes to defendants are no more than petty slights or trivial inconveniences. We disagree. Although defendants deny that any of the acts claimed by plaintiff occurred, or that he made timely complaints about the offending behavior, the court is bound to consider the disputed facts in favor of the non-movant (Vega v. Restani Const. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012] ). Disputed factual issues, especially those that require resolution of credibility issues, are generally unsuitable for summary adjudication (S.J. Capelin Assoc., v. Globe Mfg. Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 338, 341 [1974] ).

Plaintiff testified that his supervisor, defendant Hall, made repeated sexual advances towards him, including reaching out to touch his face and holding his hand in an elevator while they were alone. She also initiated conversations that made him uncomfortable, telling him she had a “crush” on him, telling him she was single and twice inviting him to her home to repair “a hole” in her apartment. In one conversation, plaintiff claimed Hall said she had a tattoo, adding that “You have to undress me to see it.” Plaintiff further testified that after he rebuffed Hall’s sexual advances, she repeatedly brought him to the Human Resources manager’s office to complain about his work product and that she solicited complaints about him from other coworkers. Plaintiff claims that he complained to HR about Hall’s behavior in December. In January he was told that either he could resign or he would be fired. If believed, a trier of fact could find that these actions, especially when considered holistically, were unwelcome sexual conduct. As we have previously recognized, sexual advances are not always explicit, and the absence of a supervisor’s direct pressure for sexual favors as a condition of employment does not negate indirect pressure or necessarily doom the claim.

The court also held that defendants were not entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s retaliatory termination claim.

93 Comments on "Sexual Harassment Claims (Quid Pro Quo, Hostile Work Environment) Survive Summary Judgment Against Hyatt"


  1. Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, awesome site!


  2. Asking questions are actually nice thing if you are not understanding something fully, however this paragraph presents pleasant understanding yet. Wade Rorrer


  3. I have read so many articles or reviews on the topic of the blogger lovers except this piece of writing is genuinely a nice paragraph, keep it up. Colin Steach


  4. This is a a great man happy nice, rally. I try hard on for next snake catcher get frind frind cook grund stake and kidnee. Bruno Fruchey


  5. If you wish for to grow your experience just keep visiting this website and be updated with the most up-to-date gossip posted here. Beau Mitsch


  6. Asking questions are genuinely pleasant thing if you are not understanding anything completely, but this post offers nice understanding even. Sebastian Bushie


  7. This also results in a foremost sensation of tiredness most of the time which manifests itself differently. Ariel Kemler


  8. You made some good points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will agree with your website. Scot Boggs


  9. Call 8130455530 for Whitefield Escorts Models. Our Horny and stunning Whitefield Call Girls are waiting in Bangalore for your Calls. Irwin Berkovitch


  10. Proin ut urna eget tortor scelerisque porttitor. Donec at justo tellus. Integer maximus erat justo, a accumsan leo iaculis nec. Gail Preisach


  11. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this article and also the rest of the site is extremely good. Everette Trease


  12. Iyaa, benar mas. Lantai tiga dan bawah tanah itu kan tempat tahanan tentara Belanda oleh Jepang. Termasuk juga tempat penyiksaan. Rocky Sleper


  13. Sometimes, they are not listed in theathe particularinside of thepreviouslyfrom theon the insideinvolvingwithin the pay table chart. Trenton Rupar


  14. No matter if some one searches for his required thing, thus he/she desires to be available that in detail, so that thing is maintained over here. Norris Lombel


  15. Just wanna input on few general things, The website pattern is perfect, the subject material is very excellent : D. Albert Nicholl


  16. I constantly emailed this webpage post page to all my associates, for the reason that if like to read it next my links will too. Bryant Turrietta


  17. Just beneath, are a lot of absolutely not associated internet sites to ours, however, they may be surely really worth going over. Branden Led


  18. My family members every time say that I am killing my time here at web, however I know I am getting knowledge daily by reading such good posts. Terrence Sifontes


  19. Your new valuable important points imply much a person like me and extremely more to my workplace workers. With thanks; out of everyone of us. Renato Krebbs


  20. There is obviously a bunch to identify about this. I feel you made some nice points in features also. Gerry Staudt


  21. I always emailed this blog post page to all my associates, since if like to read it after that my contacts will too. Garret Gajardo


  22. Hi there, its pleasant paragraph about media print, we all understand media is a great source of information. Terry Parkhill


  23. Hello! I simply wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming again to your blog for more soon. Booker Stefaniak


  24. You made a few nice points there. I did a search on the matter and found mainly people will go along with with your blog. Loren Burse


  25. I made blue cupcakes with chocolate frosting to announce to my in laws. They loved the idea. they had to peel the paper off to reveal the color. Stacey Konicek


  26. I pay a quick visit everyday a few websites and information sites to read articles or reviews, but this website provides feature based articles. Haywood Sweitzer


  27. Appreciation to my father who shared with me about this webpage, this web site is genuinely amazing. Geoffrey Codling


  28. There is noticeably a package to find out about this. I think you made sure wonderful points in attributes additionally. Lemuel Zannino


  29. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you penning this post and also the rest of the website is really good. Noel Oxnam


  30. YouTube consists of not simply comical and humorous video tutorials but also it consists of educational related movies. Jermaine Wareheim


  31. This paragraph will help the internet users for creating new webpage or even a weblog from start to end. Walter Veigel


  32. If you would like to get a great deal from this paragraph then you have to apply these methods to your won weblog. Alton Pucio


  33. Olivia thanks for sharing the handy post. Point number 6 and 7 is good addition in my list of 24 things to do when publishing a new blog post. Ariel Toal


  34. When we started using social media in its early times, it was purely for entertainment. Yet, social media is not just about that anymore. Alvin Deiter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.